<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Praj&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.praj.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.praj.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of Web Development by Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Another useful summary. Why bother doing all that research when someone else (you) has done it all for me? The limited amount of research I have done have pointed me towards a similar conclusion (Wordpress, JQuery and 960 where necessary). Hadn&#039;t looked into programming much which is odd considering that&#039;s my background (or perhaps it makes perfect sense).

That looks like a good article you&#039;ve linked to... but you&#039;re right. The list is pretty overwhelming. I guess there are some advantages to having been hanging around the web dev world for over a decade. It rules out a lot of the fluff for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Another useful summary. Why bother doing all that research when someone else (you) has done it all for me? The limited amount of research I have done have pointed me towards a similar conclusion (Wordpress, JQuery and 960 where necessary). Hadn&#8217;t looked into programming much which is odd considering that&#8217;s my background (or perhaps it makes perfect sense).</p>
<p>That looks like a good article you&#8217;ve linked to&#8230; but you&#8217;re right. The list is pretty overwhelming. I guess there are some advantages to having been hanging around the web dev world for over a decade. It rules out a lot of the fluff for you.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of Web Development by Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nearly forgot - I do all my own CSS too.  Interestingly, something like 960 would have been VERY helpful at the beginning of my project! Might have to look into it for future use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Nearly forgot &#8211; I do all my own CSS too.  Interestingly, something like 960 would have been VERY helpful at the beginning of my project! Might have to look into it for future use.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of Web Development by Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/the-state-of-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=261#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...Some interesting stuff here.  If I had have researched a bit more before I embarked on my web dev journey I probably would&#039;ve spent WAAAAAY less time learning PHP from scratch and some basic Javascript!  I&#039;m still writing my own PHP routines, but I use Prototype as a JS framework.  Perhaps it&#039;s my complete lack of formal training in programming, but it took me some time to get to grips with Prototype.  Still don&#039;t use it too much, mainly just for the AJAX-y bits on pages :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Hmmmm&#8230;Some interesting stuff here.  If I had have researched a bit more before I embarked on my web dev journey I probably would&#8217;ve spent WAAAAAY less time learning PHP from scratch and some basic Javascript!  I&#8217;m still writing my own PHP routines, but I use Prototype as a JS framework.  Perhaps it&#8217;s my complete lack of formal training in programming, but it took me some time to get to grips with Prototype.  Still don&#8217;t use it too much, mainly just for the AJAX-y bits on pages <img src='http://blog.praj.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solve the problem at hand by Lins</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/solve-the-problem-at-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Lins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=257#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I love this. It fits in exactly with my new Procrastinate Not mentality. Which I&#039;m finding exceptionally hard to implement when you keep writing interesting blogs. And sticking in interesting links. 

Absolutely unit tests are a luxury. The simplest test is: What do you want it to do? Does it do it? Brilliant. Now give it to a couple of users. Can they break it? Done! I&#039;m done with faffing. Coding for a million what-ifs (especially ones that aren&#039;t super-obvious) takes time and effort and costs the client money. It&#039;s the same with coding for a super-flexible system with features that will probably never be used. I&#039;m sure we&#039;d all be a lot happier if we can just think about what is actually needed then deliver a good product at a low cost and improve on it later IF need be. And as I&#039;ve always said &quot;you can&#039;t code for stupidity&quot;. Just like you can&#039;t insure against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->I love this. It fits in exactly with my new Procrastinate Not mentality. Which I&#8217;m finding exceptionally hard to implement when you keep writing interesting blogs. And sticking in interesting links. </p>
<p>Absolutely unit tests are a luxury. The simplest test is: What do you want it to do? Does it do it? Brilliant. Now give it to a couple of users. Can they break it? Done! I&#8217;m done with faffing. Coding for a million what-ifs (especially ones that aren&#8217;t super-obvious) takes time and effort and costs the client money. It&#8217;s the same with coding for a super-flexible system with features that will probably never be used. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;d all be a lot happier if we can just think about what is actually needed then deliver a good product at a low cost and improve on it later IF need be. And as I&#8217;ve always said &#8220;you can&#8217;t code for stupidity&#8221;. Just like you can&#8217;t insure against it.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Web Development Servers by praj</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/local-development-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>praj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=242#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Yep, I&#039;ve tried all of them out. The two best Windows-Apache-MySQL-PHP/Perl ones are XAMPP and WAMPServer. InstantRails is specifically for Ruby on Rails development and uses Apache-MySQL. 

My preference is XAMPP, its portable (but don&#039;t try to run it from a USB drive, its too slow). However I think WAMP Server is more user friendly. If you&#039;re relatively inexperience with Apache/MySQL administration, I&#039;d go for WAMP Server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Yep, I&#8217;ve tried all of them out. The two best Windows-Apache-MySQL-PHP/Perl ones are XAMPP and WAMPServer. InstantRails is specifically for Ruby on Rails development and uses Apache-MySQL. </p>
<p>My preference is XAMPP, its portable (but don&#8217;t try to run it from a USB drive, its too slow). However I think WAMP Server is more user friendly. If you&#8217;re relatively inexperience with Apache/MySQL administration, I&#8217;d go for WAMP Server.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Web Development Servers by Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/local-development-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=242#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Do you or have you used any of these? Have a favourite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Do you or have you used any of these? Have a favourite?<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware client on Linux by praj</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/vmware-client-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>praj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=130#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Helps if you add the bit about how to perform the install! Post has been updated now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Helps if you add the bit about how to perform the install! Post has been updated now.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Development Screencasts by Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/web-development-screencasts/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=215#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...having the same thought about the 960 grid system and I don&#039;t even know what it is!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Hmmmm&#8230;having the same thought about the 960 grid system and I don&#8217;t even know what it is!!<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Development Screencasts by Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/web-development-screencasts/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=215#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Wow! Where to start! Might stick a link back to this on my own blog. Looks like really useful stuff. Off to check out the 960 grid system screencast now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Wow! Where to start! Might stick a link back to this on my own blog. Looks like really useful stuff. Off to check out the 960 grid system screencast now.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shut down Button on Login Screen by praj</title>
		<link>http://blog.praj.com.au/posts/shutdown-button-on-login-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>praj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.praj.com.au/?p=128#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Thought I should clarify why you would want to do this. Its not a good idea on a production server that should not be shut down unless there is a problem. However if you are working on a development virtual machine server for instance, it can be a real time saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Thought I should clarify why you would want to do this. Its not a good idea on a production server that should not be shut down unless there is a problem. However if you are working on a development virtual machine server for instance, it can be a real time saver.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
